Torque Converter

The engineering

Automotive and structural bolting in the US quote lbf·ft, fastener and electronics work quotes lbf·in or ozf·in, everyone else quotes N·m, and older Japanese and European service manuals quote kgf·m (≈9.81 N·m each). A torque wrench bought in the wrong dialect is a permanent conversion exercise.

The killer mistake is the silent factor of 12: reading an inch-pound spec as foot-pounds over-torques a fastener twelvefold — sheared M4 screws and stripped aluminum threads are the usual evidence. Second place goes to N·m vs lbf·ft (35% apart, close enough to 'feel right' on the wrench), which is why good specs always print the unit next to the number.

Where this math comes from

The physics is lever-arm mechanics — Archimedes had the law of the lever around 250 BCE, and Newton's 1687 Principia embedded moments in the general laws of motion. The word 'torque' is much younger: James Thomson (Kelvin's engineer brother) proposed it in 1884 because rotating machinery needed a name for twisting effort distinct from work, which shares its units.

Quantified tightening is a 20th-century story: Conrad Bahr, working for the New York City water department, patented the torque wrench around 1918 so flange bolts would be evenly loaded instead of foreman-calibrated. Aviation and automotive assembly made torque specs universal — and multinational supply chains made converting them a daily chore.

1. 250 BCEArchimedesLaw of the lever — moment as force times arm.
2. 1687Isaac NewtonPrincipia embeds moments in the laws of motion.
3. 1884James ThomsonCoins 'torque' for twisting effort in machinery.
4. 1918Conrad BahrTorque wrench patented — tightening becomes a number.

See the full timeline of the math behind every calculator →

Runs entirely in your browser — nothing you enter leaves this page. Your recent runs are stored only on your device.