Cooling Tower Approach & Range
Get range, approach, and cooling effectiveness from hot/cold water temps and the ambient wet-bulb.
Your recent runs (stored only in your browser)
No calculations yet — results land here so you can compare runs.
The engineering
A cooling tower is rated on two temperature differences. Range is how much heat the tower actually rejects — the drop across the tower, set by the process load and water flow. Approach is how close the cold basin water gets to the ambient wet-bulb, and it's the true measure of tower capability: the wet-bulb is the thermodynamic floor no evaporative tower can beat.
Rule of thumb: a well-selected tower runs a 5 °C (≈9 °F) approach; chasing a tighter approach costs disproportionate fill and airflow, so a 3 °C approach tower can be nearly double the size of a 5 °C one for the same load. If your approach is climbing over time at fixed load, suspect fouled fill, low airflow, or water bypass — not a bad chiller.
Effectiveness here is range divided by the maximum possible range (hot water down to wet-bulb). It's handy for comparing towers across different days, since it normalizes out the ambient wet-bulb swing.
Where this math comes from
Evaporative cooling towers grew out of early-1900s power-plant condenser practice, when atmospheric spray ponds gave way to packed timber towers to shrink footprint and improve heat rejection. Engineers needed a common language to rate them, and "range" and "approach" became the two numbers on every selection sheet — because both are things you can read off thermometers in the field without knowing anything about the fill internals.
The Cooling Technology Institute (CTI, founded 1950 as the Cooling Tower Institute) formalized the definitions, test codes, and thermal-performance certification that made approach a contractual guarantee rather than a marketing claim. Merkel's 1925 enthalpy-driven analysis underpins the thermodynamics, but on the bench it's still range and approach that tell you whether the tower is doing its job.
- 1925Frederick MerkelPublishes the enthalpy-potential theory of evaporative cooling that underlies tower performance analysis.
- 1950Cooling Tower Institute (later CTI)Founded to standardize tower testing, terminology, and thermal ratings.
- 1975CTIATC-105 acceptance test code fixes how range and approach are measured in the field.
- 2000CTISTD-201 thermal-certification program pins manufacturer approach guarantees to independent testing.
See the full timeline of the math behind every calculator →
Runs entirely in your browser — nothing you enter leaves this page. Your recent runs are stored only on your device.